🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to employ a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that may create several five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, handed down on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to lift a district court's block that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its ruling.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely classified voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to revert to the districts established after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Opposition

Through a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action is part of a national fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican majority. Usually, redistricting occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation aligned with his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic officials decried the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

A senior Democratic leader stated the court had once again damaged its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.